|
|||||
Year/Semester of Study | 1 / Fall Semester | ||||
Level of Course | 2nd Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
Type of Course | Optional | ||||
Department | BASIC ISLAMIC SCIENCES | ||||
Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
Name of Lecturer | MEHMET KILIÇARSLAN (mkilicarslan@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
Name of Lecturer(s) | HACI MEHMET SOYSALDI, | ||||
Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
Objectives of the Course | |||||
To know formation and developing of interpreting of Qur’an in historical process, and to analysis it. |
Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
LO-1 | Students have information and knowledge generally about Quranic exegesis/tafseer from early periods to present. |
PO-1 Can be able to improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 Can be able to the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. PO-3 Can be able to make an efficient use of the resources in a relevant field of study based on their graduate level of qualifications. PO-14 Can be able to collect data related with their field of study, review and put them in practice, checking them in the process of announcing the results and taking into consideration the scientific, cultural, artistic, social and ethical values. |
Examination |
LO-2 | Students have historical knowledge about commentators, their works and methods, traditions of tafseer. |
PO-1 Can be able to improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 Can be able to the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. PO-3 Can be able to make an efficient use of the resources in a relevant field of study based on their graduate level of qualifications. PO-6 Can be able to use the knowledge they have obtained in their field of study in order to promote the level of education, culture and arts of the society. PO-14 Can be able to collect data related with their field of study, review and put them in practice, checking them in the process of announcing the results and taking into consideration the scientific, cultural, artistic, social and ethical values. |
Examination |
LO-3 | Students have information and knowledge about classical and modern tafseer schools. |
PO-1 Can be able to improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 Can be able to the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. PO-3 Can be able to make an efficient use of the resources in a relevant field of study based on their graduate level of qualifications. PO-5 Can be able to interpret, solve and produce new data by integrating the data obtained from both their field of study and different fields of study. PO-7 Can be able to carry out independent studies requiring expertise related to their field of study PO-14 Can be able to collect data related with their field of study, review and put them in practice, checking them in the process of announcing the results and taking into consideration the scientific, cultural, artistic, social and ethical values. |
Examination |
PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
Course Contents | ||
1- Beginning period of Tafseer. 2- Tafseer activities at the early periods: Ibn Ebî Hâtim and his Tafseer. 3- Linguistic tafseer. 4- The research on a sourc of tafseer: Salebi 5- Judicial tafseer 6- Theological/kelami tafseer 7- Sufi/mystic tafseer 8- Tafseer at the Ottoman Period 9- exam 10- Scientific tafseer 11- Sociological tafseer 12- Modernist tafseer (Tafseer at the modern periods). 13- Tafseer at the Republic of Turkey. 14- Historiography of tafseer and its problems. | ||
Weekly Course Content | ||
Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
1 | Quran history, Tafsir method, | Lecture Method-Question answer |
2 | The nature of the tafsir, The reasons for the different approaches in tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
3 | The birth and development of tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
4 | Tabiun's tafsir, writing of tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
5 | positional tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
6 | the examples of positional tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
7 | the examples of positional tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
8 | mid-term exam | |
9 | tenacity tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
10 | the examples of tenacity tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
11 | thematic tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
12 | sectarian tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
13 | legal tafsir, scientific tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
14 | social tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
15 | modernist tafsir | Lecture Method-Question answer |
16 | final exam | |
Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
1 | 3- Prof. Dr. Muhsin Demirci, Tefsir Tarihi, İFAV Yayınlan, İstanbul, 2014. | |
2 | İsmail Çalışkan, Tefsir Tarihi, Ankara Okulu Yayınları | |
Required Course instruments and materials | ||
1.Muhsin Demirci, Tefsir Tarihi, ?stanbul: MÜ?FV Yay?nlar?, 2010. 2.Mehmet Akif Koç, ?snad Verileri Çerçevesinde Erken Dönem Tefsir Faaliyetleri: ?bn Ebî Hâtim, Kitâbiyât, Ankara 2003. 3.Mustafa Karagöz, Dilbilimsel Tefsir ve Kur’an’? Anlamaya Katk?s?, Ankara Okulu Yay?nlar?, Ankara 2010. 4.Mehmet Akif Koç, Tefsirde Bir Kaynak ?ncelemesi, Kitâbiyât, Ankara 2005. 5.Mevlüt Güngör, Kur’an Tefsirinde F?khî Tefsir Hareketi ve ?lk F?khî Tefsir, ?stanbul: Kur’an Kitapl???, 1996. 6.Mustafa Öztürk, Kur’an’?n Mutezilî Yorumu: Ebû Müslim el-?sfahânî Örne?i, Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yay?nlar?, 2004 7.Yunus Emre Gördük, Tarihsel ve Metodolojik Aç?dan ??ari Tefsir, ?stanbul: ?nsan Yay?nlar?, 2013. 8.Mustafa Öztürk, Osmanl? Tefsir Miras?, Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yay?nlar?, 2012. 9.Celal K?rca, Kur’an ve Modern Bilimler, ?stanbul: Marifet Yay?nlar?, 1981. 10.Orhan Atalay, 20. Yüzy?l Tefsir Ak?m? -?çtimâî Tefsir-, ?stanbul: Beyan Yay?nlar?, 2004. 11.?smail Albayrak, Klasik Modernizmde Kur’an’a Yakla??mlar, ?stanbul: Ensar Ne?riyat, 2004. 12.Mustafa Öztürk, Cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde Meal ve Tefsirin Serencam?, Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yay?nlar?, 2012. 13.Mustafa Karagöz, Tefsir Tarihi Yaz?m? ve Problemleri, Ara?t?rma Yay?nlar?, Ankara 2012. |
Assessment Methods | |||
Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 40 |
Other assessment methods | |||
1.Oral Examination | |||
2.Quiz | |||
3.Laboratory exam | |||
4.Presentation | |||
5.Report | |||
6.Workshop | |||
7.Performance Project | |||
8.Term Paper | |||
9.Project | |||
final exam | 16 | 1 | 60 |
Student Work Load | |||
Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 3 | 14 | 42 |
Outside Class | |||
a) Reading | 4 | 14 | 56 |
b) Search in internet/Library | 3 | 10 | 30 |
c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 2 | 2 | 4 |
e) Term paper/Project | 3 | 2 | 6 |
Oral Examination | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quiz | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory exam | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Own study for mid-term exam | 5 | 4 | 20 |
mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Own study for final exam | 5 | 4 | 20 |
final exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
0 | |||
0 | |||
Total work load; | 180 |