Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Course Catalogue
|
|||||
| Year/Semester of Study | 3 / Spring Semester | ||||
| Level of Course | 1st Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
| Type of Course | Optional | ||||
| Department | CONTEMPORARY TURKISH DIALECTS | ||||
| Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
| Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
| Name of Lecturer | LYAZZAT NAKHANOVA (lnakhanova@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
| Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
| Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
| Objectives of the Course | |||||
| To introduce literary works written Tatar Turkish and their authors. | |||||
| Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
| The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
| LO-1 | (Students) recognize literary works written Tatar Turkish. |
PO-7 Can to read, explain and examine linguistically texts which had been written in different alphabets (Latin, Cyrillic, Arabic et al.) in Contemporary Turkic dialects. PO-11 Knowing works and authors beloning to Contemporary Turkic literatures and examining, interpreting these texts, and can to discuss by comparing these. |
Examination |
| LO-2 | Students) recognize Tatar authors and poems |
PO-11 Knowing works and authors beloning to Contemporary Turkic literatures and examining, interpreting these texts, and can to discuss by comparing these. |
Examination |
| LO-3 | (Students) evaluate literary works written Tatar Turkish. |
PO-7 Can to read, explain and examine linguistically texts which had been written in different alphabets (Latin, Cyrillic, Arabic et al.) in Contemporary Turkic dialects. PO-11 Knowing works and authors beloning to Contemporary Turkic literatures and examining, interpreting these texts, and can to discuss by comparing these. PO-13 Following developments with regard to his/her field, determining problems, gathering necessary data for solving these problems, interpreting results according to these data, and making contribution to occupational subjects by sharing studies which he/she did with the relevant persons, institutions and organizations, when required. |
Examination |
| PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
|||
| Course Contents | ||
| Tatar literature discusses periods. Post Tatar literature, literary works and personalities are evaluated | ||
| Weekly Course Content | ||
| Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
| 1 | Characteristics of 20th century literature Tatar Said Remiyev | expression method, examination |
| 2 | Mecit Gafurî | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 3 | Şerif Kemal | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 4 | Tatar literature in the Soviet Era | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 5 | Aliasgar Kemal | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 6 | Miraziz Ukmasî | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 7 | Kerim Tinçurin | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 8 | mid-term exam | |
| 9 | Ziya Yermekî | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 10 | Zarif Beşirî | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 11 | Mirhaydar Beşirî | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 12 | Taji İzzet | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 13 | Şeyhzade Babiç | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 14 | Hasan Tufan | expression method, examination, text analysis |
| 15 | Said Remiyev | examination, text analysis |
| 16 | final exam | |
| Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
| 1 | KOLCU, Ali İhsan, Çağdaş Türk Dünyası Edebiyatı, Salkım Söğüt Yayınları, Erzurum, 2006. | |
| 2 | Türk Dünyası El Kitabı, Türk Kültürü Araştırma Enstitüsü, , Ankara, 1998. | |
| 3 | TOGAN, A. Zeki Velidi, Bugünkü Türkili (Türkistan) ve Yakın Tarihi, Cilt:I, İstanbul, 1981. | |
| 4 | YAMAN, Ertuğrul, Türk Dünyası Ortak Edebiyatı, TDK Yayınları, Ankara, 2004. | |
| 5 | İNAN, Abdülkadir, Makaleler ve İncelemeler, 1. Cilt, TDK, Ankara,1998. | |
| Required Course instruments and materials | ||
| Computer, books, projektor, CD. | ||
| Assessment Methods | |||
| Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
| mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 40 |
| Other assessment methods | |||
| 1.Oral Examination | |||
| 2.Quiz | |||
| 3.Laboratory exam | |||
| 4.Presentation | |||
| 5.Report | |||
| 6.Workshop | |||
| 7.Performance Project | |||
| 8.Term Paper | |||
| 9.Project | |||
| final exam | 16 | 1 | 60 |
| Student Work Load | |||
| Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
| Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 3 | 14 | 42 |
| Outside Class | |||
| a) Reading | 3 | 14 | 42 |
| b) Search in internet/Library | 2 | 7 | 14 |
| c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
| d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 0 | ||
| e) Term paper/Project | 0 | ||
| Oral Examination | 0 | ||
| Quiz | 0 | ||
| Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
| Own study for mid-term exam | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Own study for final exam | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| final exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| Total work load; | 120 | ||