|
|||||
Year/Semester of Study | 3 / Fall Semester | ||||
Level of Course | 1st Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
Type of Course | Optional | ||||
Department | PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | ||||
Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
Name of Lecturer | MUSTAFA ARSLAN (m.arslan@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
Objectives of the Course | |||||
The aim of this course is to teach the development of comparative public administration discipline and to unfold the unique structure of Turkish public administration when compared with other systems. |
Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
LO-1 | Can identify the basics of comparative public administration. |
PO-2 Identify and compare concrete models of international and national public administration, determine problems and develop solution-oriented models; |
Examination |
LO-2 | Can identify and describe different public administration systems. |
PO-2 Identify and compare concrete models of international and national public administration, determine problems and develop solution-oriented models; |
Examination |
LO-3 | Will be able to analyse the structure of Turkish public administration system when compared with other systems. |
PO-1 Upon successful completion of the program students:
Learn essential theoretical and empirical concepts of the discipline’s main branches, Political Science, Administration Science, Urbanization and Environmental Problems and Legal Sciences and gain a perspective which is appropriate for creating solutions in this scope;
PO-2 Identify and compare concrete models of international and national public administration, determine problems and develop solution-oriented models; PO-3 Analyze compenents of political, administrative and institutional systems, design institutional systems, and make operational the process of decision-making and coordination mechanisms which are effective for institutionalization; PO-5 Have ability to collect data, analyze and interpret the results via utilizing accumulation of information and interdisciplinary point of view while identifying and solving existing public administration problems; |
Examination |
LO-4 | Can discuss the consequences of reforms in public administration systems in a comparative perspective. |
PO-1 Upon successful completion of the program students:
Learn essential theoretical and empirical concepts of the discipline’s main branches, Political Science, Administration Science, Urbanization and Environmental Problems and Legal Sciences and gain a perspective which is appropriate for creating solutions in this scope;
PO-2 Identify and compare concrete models of international and national public administration, determine problems and develop solution-oriented models; PO-3 Analyze compenents of political, administrative and institutional systems, design institutional systems, and make operational the process of decision-making and coordination mechanisms which are effective for institutionalization; PO-4 Gain ability to adaptate oneself to technologic innovations and use the maximum level of information technologies in order to make managerial decision-making and implementation process more efficient in terms of time and resources; PO-5 Have ability to collect data, analyze and interpret the results via utilizing accumulation of information and interdisciplinary point of view while identifying and solving existing public administration problems; |
Examination |
PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
Course Contents | ||
Development of comparative public administration discipline; the problems about comparative public administration; comparative public administration models and theories of bureaucracy; country examples; globalisation and comparison of change. | ||
Weekly Course Content | ||
Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
1 | Definition and development of comparative public administration | Lecture |
2 | The problems of Comparative public administration | Lecture |
3 | Comparative Public Administration Models | Lecture |
4 | Theories of Bureaucracy | Lecture |
5 | Main Public Administration Traditions | Lecture |
6 | Country Examples-1 France | Lecture |
7 | Country Examples-2 United States of America | Lecture |
8 | mid-term exam | |
9 | Country Examples-3 England | Lecture |
10 | Country Examples-4 Germany | Lecture |
11 | Country Examples-5 Japan | Lecture |
12 | Country Examples-6 Russia | Lecture |
13 | European Union | Lecture |
14 | Comparative analysis of Turkish Public Administration | Lecture |
15 | Globalization and the comparison of change | Lecture |
16 | final exam | |
Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
1 | Kutlu, Önder, Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Yönetimi : Teorik Çerçeve ve Ülke Uygulamaları, Çizgi Kitabevi, 2006. | |
2 | Güler, Birgül Ayman, Karasu, Koray, Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri (2. Basım, 2009). | |
3 | Rathod, P.B., Comparative Public Administration, Global Media, 2007. | |
4 | Chandler, J.A., Comparative Public Administration, Routledge, 2000. | |
5 | Parlak Bekir, Caner Cantürk (2009). Karşılaştırmalı Siyasal Yönetimler ve Yönetsel Yapılar, Alfa Aktüel, İstanbul. | |
Required Course instruments and materials | ||
Projection, Maps |
Assessment Methods | |||
Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 40 |
Other assessment methods | |||
1.Oral Examination | |||
2.Quiz | |||
3.Laboratory exam | |||
4.Presentation | |||
5.Report | |||
6.Workshop | |||
7.Performance Project | |||
8.Term Paper | |||
9.Project | |||
final exam | 16 | 1 | 60 |
Student Work Load | |||
Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 3 | 14 | 42 |
Outside Class | |||
a) Reading | 2 | 14 | 28 |
b) Search in internet/Library | 2 | 14 | 28 |
c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 0 | ||
e) Term paper/Project | 0 | ||
Oral Examination | 0 | ||
Quiz | 0 | ||
Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
Own study for mid-term exam | 9 | 1 | 9 |
mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Own study for final exam | 9 | 1 | 9 |
final exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
0 | |||
0 | |||
Total work load; | 118 |