Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Course Catalogue
|
|||||
| Year/Semester of Study | 1 / Fall Semester | ||||
| Level of Course | 3rd Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
| Type of Course | Optional | ||||
| Department | TOURISM MANAGEMENT (DOCTORATE DEGREE) | ||||
| Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
| Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
| Name of Lecturer | İBRAHİM İLHAN (ibrahim@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
| Name of Lecturer(s) | İBRAHİM İLHAN, | ||||
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
| Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
| Objectives of the Course | |||||
| The purpose is to give students the ability to contemplate, and discuss in the field of the philosophy of science and, thereby, to develop their own views of what science is and how their research contributes to the sience. | |||||
| Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
| The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
| LO-1 | Demonstrates an advanced understanding of the field of philosophy of science |
PO-4 Plan, conduct, evaluate and report a study using scientific research methods. PO-9 Develop behaviors and competencies required for lifelong learning. PO-10 Analyze, critically interpret and evaluate the knowledge and skills they have gained. |
Examination Presentation |
| LO-2 | describes significance and relevance of empirical methods for the field of tourism |
PO-4 Plan, conduct, evaluate and report a study using scientific research methods. PO-9 Develop behaviors and competencies required for lifelong learning. PO-10 Analyze, critically interpret and evaluate the knowledge and skills they have gained. |
Examination Presentation |
| LO-3 | demonstrates a thorough understanding of a larger theme within the field of tourism |
PO-4 Plan, conduct, evaluate and report a study using scientific research methods. PO-9 Develop behaviors and competencies required for lifelong learning. PO-10 Analyze, critically interpret and evaluate the knowledge and skills they have gained. |
Examination Presentation |
| PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
|||
| Course Contents | ||
| Philosophy, Science, Philosophy of Science, Approaches to Science, Value of science and its Funtions in Society, Verifivationism, Theory of Falcification, Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Theoretical Foundations of and Contemporary Philosophy of Social Sciences. Method in Social Science.Modern and Postmodern Science, Research Ethics. | ||
| Weekly Course Content | ||
| Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
| 1 | Philosopy | Lecturing, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 2 | Science | Lecturing, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 3 | Philosophy of Science | Lecturing, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 4 | Method in Social Science | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 5 | Features of science | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 6 | Value of Science | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 7 | Science Theories | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 8 | mid-term exam | |
| 9 | Ontology and Science Logical Positivism | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 10 | Theory of Falcification and Karl Popper | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 11 | Thomes Kuhn and Structure of Scientific Revolutions | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 12 | Metlıodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Imre Lakatos | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 13 | Postmodern Science | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 14 | Science in a Free Society -Paul Feyerabend | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 15 | Philosophy of Social Science - Summary | Project Presentation, Question- Answer, Discussion |
| 16 | final exam | |
| Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
| 1 | Cemal Yıldırım, Bilim Felsefesi, 3. Basım, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul, 1991. | |
| 2 | Cemal Yıldırım, Bilimsel Düşünme Yöntemi, Bilgi Yayınevi, Ankara, 1997. | |
| 3 | A. Kadir Çüçen, Bilim Felsefesine Giriş, Sentez Yayıncılık, Bursa, 2012. | |
| 4 | Ömer Demir, Bilim Felsefesi, Vadi Yayınları, Ankara, 2000. | |
| 5 | Peter Winch, Sosyal Bilim Düşüncesi ve Felsefe, Çeviren: Ömer Demir, 2. Basım, Vadi Yayınları, Ankara, 2007., | |
| 6 | Karl R. Popper, Bilimsel ASraştırmanın Mantığı, Çevirenler: İlknur Aka ve İbrahim Turan, 2. Baskı, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2003. | |
| 7 | Andrew Sayer, Sosyal Bilimde Yöntem: Realist Bir Yaklaşım, Küre Yayınları, İstanbul, 2016. | |
| 8 | Doğan Özlem, Bilim Felsefesi, Notos Kitap Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2010. | |
| 9 | Alex Rosenberg, Bilim Felsefesi: Çağdaş Bir Giriş, Dipnot Yayınları, Ankara, 2015. | |
| 10 | Brian Fay, Çağdaş Sosyal Bilimler Felsefesi: Çokkiiltürlü Bir Yaklaşım, Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul, 2005. | |
| 11 | Dominique Lecourt, Bilim Felsefesi, Dost Kitabevi Yayınlan, Ankara, 2016. | |
| 12 | Imre Lakatos, Bilimsel Araştırma Programlarının Metodolojisi, Alfa, İstanbul, 2014. | |
| 13 | John Losee, Bilim Felsefesine Tarihsel Bir Giriş, Dost Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara, 2012. | |
| 14 | Paul Feyerabend, Bilim Kilisesi: Özgür Bir Toplumda Bilim, Türkçesi: Cevdet Cerit, Pınar Yayınları, İstanbul, 1991. | |
| 15 | Pierre Bourdieu, Bilimin Toplumsal Kullanımları: Bilimsel Alanın Klinik Bir Sosyolojisi İçin, Heretik Yayınları, Ankara, 2013. | |
| 16 | Richard E. Lee ve Immanuel Vvallerstein, İki Kültürü Aşmak: Modem Dünya Sisteminde Fen Bilimleri ile Beşeri Bilimler Ayrılığı, Metis Yayınları, İstanbul, 2007. | |
| 17 | Teo Grunberg ve David Grunberg, Bilim Felsefesi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, 2013. | |
| 18 | Thomas S. Kuhn, Asal Gerilim, Bilimsel Gelenek ve Değişim Üzerine Seçme İncelemeler, Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul, 1994. | |
| Required Course instruments and materials | ||
| Computer, Projection. | ||
| Assessment Methods | |||
| Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
| mid-term exam | 8 | 2 | 40 |
| Other assessment methods | |||
| 1.Oral Examination | |||
| 2.Quiz | |||
| 3.Laboratory exam | |||
| 4.Presentation | |||
| 5.Report | |||
| 6.Workshop | 2 | 30 | |
| 7.Performance Project | |||
| 8.Term Paper | |||
| 9.Project | |||
| final exam | 16 | 2 | 30 |
| Student Work Load | |||
| Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
| Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 3 | 14 | 42 |
| Outside Class | |||
| a) Reading | 3 | 14 | 42 |
| b) Search in internet/Library | 2 | 14 | 28 |
| c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
| d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 2 | 14 | 28 |
| e) Term paper/Project | 2 | 7 | 14 |
| Oral Examination | 0 | ||
| Quiz | 0 | ||
| Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
| Own study for mid-term exam | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| mid-term exam | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Own study for final exam | 4 | 3 | 12 |
| final exam | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| Total work load; | 180 | ||