Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Course Catalogue
|
|||||
| Year/Semester of Study | 1 / Fall Semester | ||||
| Level of Course | 2nd Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
| Type of Course | Optional | ||||
| Department | TURKISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (DOCTORATE DEGREE) | ||||
| Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
| Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
| Name of Lecturer | BAYRAM DURBİLMEZ (bdurbilmez@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
| Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
| Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
| Objectives of the Course | |||||
| Determine the cultural environments that are effective in the formation of epic tradition, determine its place in the tradition of the bards that grow in these environments, to earn tradition narration research method. | |||||
| Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
| The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
| LO-1 | Get information about the epic tradition of the Turkish world. |
PO-1 improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level and master level qualifications in their field of study. PO-2 Interpret, solve and produce new data by integrating the data obtained from both their field of study and different fields of study. PO-3 Use the relevant research methods and techniques and have both theoretical and practical knowledges in their field of study. PO-4 Make an efficient use of the resources in a relevant field of study based on their graduate levels of qualifications. PO-6 Carry out independent studies requiring expertise related to their field of study. |
Examination |
| LO-2 | Compares the epic traditions. |
PO-1 improve and deepen their knowledge in the same or different field based on the graduate level and master level qualifications in their field of study. PO-7 Grasp the knowledge related to their field of study and make it public in line with the norms. PO-8 Collect data related with their field of study, review and put them in practice, checking them in the process of announcing the results and taking into consideration the scientific, cultural, artistic, social and ethical values. PO-13 Grasp the interdisciplinary interaction of their field of study and conduct joint studies with different fields of study. |
Examination |
| PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
|||
| Course Contents | ||
| The emergence of epic tradition, development, the identity of epic teller, epic teller schools in the Turkic world, in works of art, bards' epic-telling techniques. | ||
| Weekly Course Content | ||
| Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
| 1 | The term of epic | Method of Narration |
| 2 | Epic relationship with other species | Method of Narration |
| 3 | Pre-Islamic Turkish epics | Method of Narration, Article review |
| 4 | Ozan type | Method of Narration, Article review |
| 5 | Epic performance | Method of Narration, Article review |
| 6 | Epic performance | Method of Narration, Source Browsing |
| 7 | Telling epic environments and time | Method of Narration, Source Browsing |
| 8 | mid-term exam | |
| 9 | Uzbek epic tradition | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 10 | Uzbek epic tradition | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 11 | Turkmen epic tradition | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 12 | Kazakh-Kyrgyz epic tradition | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 13 | Kazakh-Kyrgyz epic tradition | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 14 | Siberian epic tradition | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 15 | Siberian epic tradition | Source Browsing, Comparison |
| 16 | final exam | |
| Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
| 1 | Çobanoğlu, Ö.Türk Dünyası Epik Destan Geleneği, Ankara 2003. | |
| 2 | Şakir İbrayev. Destanın Yapısı. AKM Yay. Ankara, 1998. | |
| 3 | Karl R.Türk Boylarının Destanları. Ankara 2002. | |
| 4 | Hatto, A. (ed.) Traditions of Heroic and Epic Poetry: The Traditions. London,1980. | |
| 5 | Gökyay, Orhan Şaik, Dedem Korkudun Kitabı, İstanbul 1973. | |
| Required Course instruments and materials | ||
| Books, computers, projectors, CD. | ||
| Assessment Methods | |||
| Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
| mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 40 |
| Other assessment methods | |||
| 1.Oral Examination | |||
| 2.Quiz | |||
| 3.Laboratory exam | |||
| 4.Presentation | |||
| 5.Report | |||
| 6.Workshop | |||
| 7.Performance Project | |||
| 8.Term Paper | |||
| 9.Project | |||
| final exam | 16 | 1 | 60 |
| Student Work Load | |||
| Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
| Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 5 | 14 | 70 |
| Outside Class | |||
| a) Reading | 7 | 7 | 49 |
| b) Search in internet/Library | 6 | 5 | 30 |
| c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
| d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 0 | ||
| e) Term paper/Project | 0 | ||
| Oral Examination | 0 | ||
| Quiz | 0 | ||
| Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
| Own study for mid-term exam | 6 | 4 | 24 |
| mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Own study for final exam | 7 | 5 | 35 |
| final exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0 | |||
| 0 | |||
| Total work load; | 210 | ||