|
|||||
Year/Semester of Study | 4 / Spring Semester | ||||
Level of Course | 1st Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
Type of Course | Optional | ||||
Department | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | ||||
Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
Name of Lecturer | GONCA ZEYNEP TUNÇBİLEK (tgonca@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
Objectives of the Course | |||||
In human life and landscape architecture emphasize the vital of ergonomics and anthropometry and functional and aesthetic aspects of design work ergonometric and anthropometric use of knowledge to and from these studies set out the professional meaning of work in the fields of high-level synthesis and applications ability to gain. |
Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
LO-1 | can understand the theories and concepts related to ergonomics in architectural design. |
PO-1 To be able to make landscape planning, design and application on the basis of sustainability using knowledge and skills related to basic design and planning in the field
PO-2 Having professional responsibility and ethical values PO-3 To be able to interdisciplinary team work PO-11 Ability to recognize landscape constructions and materials and to develop construction details |
Performance Project Term Paper |
LO-2 | can comprehend ergonomics research and methods in architectural design. |
PO-1 To be able to make landscape planning, design and application on the basis of sustainability using knowledge and skills related to basic design and planning in the field
PO-2 Having professional responsibility and ethical values PO-3 To be able to interdisciplinary team work |
Examination Performance Project |
PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
Course Contents | ||
The meanings expressed by ergonomic and anthropometric concepts., The importance of ergonomics and anthropometry in our lives. The importance and work place of ergonomics and anthropometry in landscape architecture practices. Ergonomic and anthropometric sense of right and wrong of samples exhibiting | ||
Weekly Course Content | ||
Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
1 | The meaning of ergonomics and anthropometry | Distance Learning |
2 | Human-environment interaction | Distance Learning |
3 | Working areas of landscape architecture | Distance Learning |
4 | The importance and place of ergonomics and anthropometry in our lives | Distance Learning |
5 | Factors that play a role in ergonomics and anthropometry | Distance Learning |
6 | Ergonomic measures | Distance Learning |
7 | The importance of ergonomics and anthropometry in the work areas of landscape architecture | Distance Learning |
8 | mid-term exam | |
9 | Factors affecting human performance and the role of ergonomics and anthropometry | Distance Learning |
10 | Comfort and aesthetic approach to ergonomics and anthropometry | Distance Learning |
11 | Ergonomics and anthropometry of interior reinforcing element | Distance Learning |
12 | Ergonomics and anthropometry of exterior reinforcing element | Distance Learning |
13 | Anthropometric and ergonomic terms of landscape architecture and the correct usage examples | Distance Learning |
14 | Examples of improper use of ergonomic and anthropometric aspects in landscape architecture | Distance Learning |
15 | Observations of anthropometric and ergonomics using in public areas | Distance Learning |
16 | final exam | |
Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
1 | 1. Harzadin, G.; 1980; Ergonomi, E.Ü. Makine Müh. Böl., Yayın No: 22 İzmir, 53 sayfa | |
2 | 2. Hoke JR, J.R.; 1988; Architectural Graphic Standards, The American Institute of Architects, Amerika, 854 sayfa | |
3 | 4. Çakar, Lütfi, (1993). Tasarımda İnsan Faktörü. İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Döner Sermaye İşletmesi Prof. Dr. Nazım Terzioğlu Basım Atölyesi, İstanbul | |
4 | 3. Gönen, Emine., Özgen, Özlen, (1995). "Yasam Kalitesi ve Ergonomi". | |
Required Course instruments and materials | ||
1. Harzadin, G.; 1980; Ergonomi, E.Ü. Makine Müh. Böl., Yay?n No: 22 ?zmir, 53 sayfa 2. Hoke JR, J.R.; 1988; Architectural Graphic Standards, The American Institute of Architects, Amerika, 854 sayfa 3. Woodson, W.E.; 1981; Human Factors Design Handbook, Printed and Bound by the Kingspost Press, ?ngiltere, 1047 sayfa 4. Çakar, Lütfi, (1993). Tasar?mda ?nsan Faktörü. ?stanbul Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Döner Sermaye ??letmesi Prof. Dr. Naz?m Terzio?lu Bas?m Atölyesi, ?stanbul 5. YARDIMCI K?TAPLAR: 1. Gönen, Emine., Özgen, Özlen, (1995). "Yasam Kalitesi ve Ergonomi". 5. Ergonomi Kongresi, Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yay?nlar? No: 570, 280-288, ?stanbul 2. ?ncir, Gülten, (1986). Ergonomi. Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi, Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yay?nlar? No: 240, Ankara 3. |
Assessment Methods | |||
Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
mid-term exam | 1 | 30 | |
Other assessment methods | |||
1.Oral Examination | |||
2.Quiz | |||
3.Laboratory exam | |||
4.Presentation | |||
5.Report | |||
6.Workshop | |||
7.Performance Project | |||
8.Term Paper | |||
9.Project | 1 | 20 | |
final exam | 2 | 50 |
Student Work Load | |||
Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 2 | 14 | 28 |
Outside Class | |||
a) Reading | 0 | ||
b) Search in internet/Library | 1 | 7 | 7 |
c) Performance Project | 1 | 5 | 5 |
d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 0 | ||
e) Term paper/Project | 2 | 14 | 28 |
Oral Examination | 0 | ||
Quiz | 0 | ||
Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
Own study for mid-term exam | 2 | 6 | 12 |
mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Own study for final exam | 1 | 6 | 6 |
final exam | 2 | 1 | 2 |
0 | |||
0 | |||
Total work load; | 89 |