Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Course Catalogue
|
|||||
| Year/Semester of Study | 1 / Spring Semester | ||||
| Level of Course | 3rd Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
| Type of Course | Optional | ||||
| Department | ARKEOLOJİ (DOKTORA) | ||||
| Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | None | ||||
| Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
| Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
| Name of Lecturer | HANDAN YILDIZHAN (handanyildizhan@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
| Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
| Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
| Objectives of the Course | |||||
| The aim of the course is to help the student distinguish and analyze the regional characteristics of the Classical, Hellenistic, and Roman Periods of the Cappadocia by the archaeological finds belonging to these periods. | |||||
| Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
| The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
| LO-1 | Can distinguish local and foreign elements in the data of ceramics, architecture and small finds from settlements in the Cappadocia region. |
PO-1 Be able to conduct and present detailed research in accordance with scientific norms on a specific subject related to the field. PO-2 Can approach analytically the problems encountered in practice and theoretical work. PO-3 He/she can have expert knowledge on a specific subject related to his/her field. PO-8 To be able to distinguish and analyze the period, style and chronology problems of archaeological data and material. PO-12 History, geography, economics, anthropology, architecture, etc. can use the data of different scientific disciplines to solve the problems of Archeology. PO-13 Able to work in a disciplinary and interdisciplinary team. PO-14 Being aware of the necessity of following the current developments in the field, they can acquire the habit of browsing Turkish and foreign languages (library and informatics), using them and learning lifelong. PO-16 May have the ability to work individually and make independent decisions in the solution of archaeological problems. |
Presentation Term Paper |
| LO-2 | Can distinguish and analyze the regional features of Hellenistic and Classical Periods of Cappadocia |
PO-1 Be able to conduct and present detailed research in accordance with scientific norms on a specific subject related to the field. PO-3 He/she can have expert knowledge on a specific subject related to his/her field. PO-4 It can teach the knowledge and skills acquired in the field. PO-5 Can make oral and written publications in accordance with scientific criteria in the field. PO-8 To be able to distinguish and analyze the period, style and chronology problems of archaeological data and material. PO-12 History, geography, economics, anthropology, architecture, etc. can use the data of different scientific disciplines to solve the problems of Archeology. PO-13 Able to work in a disciplinary and interdisciplinary team. PO-14 Being aware of the necessity of following the current developments in the field, they can acquire the habit of browsing Turkish and foreign languages (library and informatics), using them and learning lifelong. PO-16 May have the ability to work individually and make independent decisions in the solution of archaeological problems. |
Presentation Term Paper |
| LO-3 | Can determine from which cultural area the foreign influences on the regional elements originate. |
PO-1 Be able to conduct and present detailed research in accordance with scientific norms on a specific subject related to the field. PO-3 He/she can have expert knowledge on a specific subject related to his/her field. PO-4 It can teach the knowledge and skills acquired in the field. PO-5 Can make oral and written publications in accordance with scientific criteria in the field. PO-8 To be able to distinguish and analyze the period, style and chronology problems of archaeological data and material. PO-10 It can record archaeological data visually and verbally by using technological tools. PO-12 History, geography, economics, anthropology, architecture, etc. can use the data of different scientific disciplines to solve the problems of Archeology. PO-13 Able to work in a disciplinary and interdisciplinary team. PO-14 Being aware of the necessity of following the current developments in the field, they can acquire the habit of browsing Turkish and foreign languages (library and informatics), using them and learning lifelong. PO-16 May have the ability to work individually and make independent decisions in the solution of archaeological problems. |
Presentation Term Paper |
| LO-4 | Can present research results in accordance with scientific and ethical rules. |
PO-1 Be able to conduct and present detailed research in accordance with scientific norms on a specific subject related to the field. PO-2 Can approach analytically the problems encountered in practice and theoretical work. PO-3 He/she can have expert knowledge on a specific subject related to his/her field. PO-4 It can teach the knowledge and skills acquired in the field. PO-5 Can make oral and written publications in accordance with scientific criteria in the field. PO-6 He/she can carry out studies that will make new contributions to the science of archeology in his field of specialization. PO-7 Ability to create and carry out projects individually. PO-16 May have the ability to work individually and make independent decisions in the solution of archaeological problems. |
Presentation Term Paper |
| LO-5 | Can plan and take responsibility for a research report based on literature research. |
PO-1 Be able to conduct and present detailed research in accordance with scientific norms on a specific subject related to the field. PO-2 Can approach analytically the problems encountered in practice and theoretical work. PO-3 He/she can have expert knowledge on a specific subject related to his/her field. PO-4 It can teach the knowledge and skills acquired in the field. PO-5 Can make oral and written publications in accordance with scientific criteria in the field. PO-7 Ability to create and carry out projects individually. PO-9 Solve the conservation of archaeological material and its publicity in relation to tourism and environment. PO-13 Able to work in a disciplinary and interdisciplinary team. PO-16 May have the ability to work individually and make independent decisions in the solution of archaeological problems. |
Presentation Term Paper |
| LO-6 | Can interpret and criticize archaeological data |
PO-1 Be able to conduct and present detailed research in accordance with scientific norms on a specific subject related to the field. PO-2 Can approach analytically the problems encountered in practice and theoretical work. PO-8 To be able to distinguish and analyze the period, style and chronology problems of archaeological data and material. PO-12 History, geography, economics, anthropology, architecture, etc. can use the data of different scientific disciplines to solve the problems of Archeology. PO-13 Able to work in a disciplinary and interdisciplinary team. PO-14 Being aware of the necessity of following the current developments in the field, they can acquire the habit of browsing Turkish and foreign languages (library and informatics), using them and learning lifelong. PO-16 May have the ability to work individually and make independent decisions in the solution of archaeological problems. |
Presentation Term Paper |
| PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
|||
| Course Contents | ||
| The Cappadocia Region, which is an important region of Anatolia, will be investigated primarily in light of the data provided by modern excavations and research. Local and foreign elements in the data related to ceramics, architecture, and small finds belonging to the settlements identified in the region will be determined, and then it will be tried to determine from which cultural area the foreign influences on these regional elements originate. | ||
| Weekly Course Content | ||
| Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
| 1 | Acquaintance and Scope | Question-Answer |
| 2 | Overview of Cappadocia Region Geomorphology | Narration Method |
| 3 | An Overview of the Historical Geography of the Cappadocia Region | Narration Method |
| 4 | Overview of Cappadocia Region Archaeological Excavations and Researches | Oral presentation |
| 5 | Cappadocia Region in the Classical Period in the Light of Eğigraphical and Archaeological Data | Oral presentation |
| 6 | Cappadocia Region under Persian Domination and Cappadocian Satrapy (?) | Oral presentation |
| 7 | The Cappadocia Region and the Kingdom of Cappadocia in the Hellenistic Period in the Light of Epigraphical and Archaeological Data | Oral presentation |
| 8 | mid-term exam | |
| 9 | The Ceramic Production Tradition of the Kızılırmak Basin and Cappadocia Region in the Hellenistic Period | Oral presentation |
| 10 | Hellenistic Settlements in Cappadocia | Oral presentation |
| 11 | Cappadocia and Province of Cappadocia in the Roman Period in the Light of Epigraphical and Archaeological Data | Oral presentation |
| 12 | Roman Settlements in Cappadocia | Oral presentation |
| 13 | Dead Cult and Burial Traditions of the Cappadocia in the Hellenistic Period | Oral presentation |
| 14 | Dead Cult and Burial Traditions of the Cappadocia in the Roman period | Oral presentation |
| 15 | n the light of examples, Rock -cutTombs of the Cappadocia in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods | Oral presentation |
| 16 | final exam | |
| Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
| 1 | K. Balkan, O. Sümer, “1968 Yılı Hacıbektaş Höyüğü (Suluca Karahöyük) Ön Raporu”, Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi XVIII/1, 1-37, Ankara, 1969 | |
| 2 | A. Mercan, “Hacıbektaş-Suluca Karahöyük 1991 Yılı Kurtarma Kazısı”, Sanat Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi 11, 69-70, 1992 | |
| 3 | L. Polacco, “Topaklı 1967 Kazısı”, Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi XVI, 177-184, 1968 | |
| 4 | L. Polacco, “Topaklı’daki İtalyan Kazılarında: Tarih Öncesinden Bizans Dönemine”, Anadolu XVII, 31-41, 1973 | |
| 5 | A. Schachner, A. Yenipınar, M. Gülyaz, Ş.Y. Schachner, “Die Civelek-Höhle in der Nähe von Gülşehir,” Istanbuler Mitteilungen 47, 9-38, İstanbul, 1997 | |
| 6 | H. Server, “Zank Höyük Kurtarma Kazısı- 1991”, XIV. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 1, 247-258, Ankara, 1992 | |
| 7 | H. Server, “Zank Höyük Kurtarma Kazısı- 1992”, XV. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 1, 255-266, Ankara, 1994 | |
| 8 | H. Server, “Zank Höyük Kurtarma Kazısı- 1996”, XIX. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 1, 529-542, Ankara, 1998 | |
| 9 | S. Y. Şahin, “Sarılar 2 No’lu Tümülüsü, VI. Müze Kurtarma Kazıları Seminerleri, 287-300, Ankara, 1996 | |
| 10 | S. Y. Şenyurt, A. Akçay, Y. Kamış, “Ovaören 2012 Yılı Kazıları,” XXXV. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 2, 62-80, Muğla, 2013 | |
| 11 | S.Y. Şenyurt, A. Akçay, Y. Kamış, “Ovaören 2013 Yılı Kazıları,” XXXVI. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 2, 101-120, Gaziantep, 2014 | |
| 12 | S. Y. Şenyurt, A. Akçay, Y. Kamış, “Ovaören 2014 Yılı Kazıları,” XXXVII. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 2,111-120, Erzurum, 2015 | |
| 13 | S. Y. Şenyurt, A. Akçay, “Ovaören 2015-2016 Yılı Kazıları,” XXXIX. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 2, 571-586, Bursa, 2017 | |
| 14 | H. Yenipınar, “Nevşehir Emek Mahallesi’nde Ortaya Çıkan Temel Kalıntısı”, Nevşehir Kültür ve Tarih Çalışmaları 3, 21-23, Nevşehir, 2005 | |
| 15 | S. Gülçür, “Aksaray, Nevşehir, Niğde İlleri 1998 Yüzey Araştırması”, XVIII. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 2, 149-162, Ankara, 2000 | |
| 16 | S. Omura,“1989 Yılı Kırşehir, Yozgat, Nevşehir, Aksaray İlleri İçinde Yürütülen Yüzey Araştırmaları,” VIII. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 69-89, Ankara, 1990 | |
| 17 | H. Server, S. Bayram, S. Çeçen, S. Menekşe, “1990 Yılı Nevşehir, Niğde ve Aksaray İlleri Yüzey Araştırmaları”, IX. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 523-539, Ankara, 1992 | |
| 18 | S. Y. Şenyurt, “Nevşehir İli 1997 Yılı Yüzey Araştırması”, XVI. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 1, 451-466, Ankara, 1998 | |
| 19 | S. Y. Şenyurt, “Nevşehir İli 1998 Yılı Yüzey Araştırması”, XVII. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 2, 365-380, Ankara, 1999 | |
| 20 | A. Türker, “Tunç Çağlarında Nevşehir Kültürlerinin Araştırılması 2012-2013 Yılı Çalışma Raporu: Hacıbektaş ve Çevresi”, XXXVI. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 1, 231-252, Gaziantep, 2014. | |
| 21 | Köker Gökçe, E. 2021. “Zank Höyük 1991, 1996 ve 1997 Yılları Kazı Çalışmalarında Tespit Edilen Hellenistik-Roma Dönemi Seramikleri”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 166: 131-146. | |
| 22 | Waagé, F. O. 1937. “Greek, Hellenistic and Roman Pottery from Alişar”, H. H. von der Osten (yay.) The Alishar Hüyük Season of 1930-32, Part III. OIP 30: 74-88. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. | |
| 23 | Jones, F. F. 1969. “Sherds from Kululu”, Anadolu (Anatolia) XIII/13: 89-96. | |
| 24 | French, D. 2012. Roman Roads and Milestones in Asiaminör, Milestones, Fasc. 3.3. Cappadocia. London. | |
| 25 | Durukan, M. 2012. Kapadokya’da, Argaios Dağı Çevresinde Hellenistik-Roma Dönemi Mezarları ve Ölü Kültü. İstanbul. | |
| 26 | Durukan, M. 2012. Kapadokya’da, Argaios Dağı Çevresinde Hellenistik-Roma Dönemi Mezarları ve Ölü Kültü. İstanbul. | |
| 27 | H. Yıldızhan, “Arkeolojik Buluntular Işığında yeni Bir Nekropol ve Höyüğü: Belkuyu”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi 169, 105-120, İstanbul, 2022. | |
| 28 | H. Yıldızhan., Nevşehir İli ve İlçeleri Arkeolojik Yüzey Araştırmaları 2019-2021, Yüzey Araştırmaları C/2, 31-50, 2022. | |
| 29 | -H. Yıldızhan, “Avanos’un Geç Hellenistik ve Roma Dönemlerine İlişkin Arkeolojik Yeni Veriler,” Kapadokya Doğal, Jeolojik ve Kültürel Miras Çalıştayı 2-3 Kasım 2021. | |
| 30 | -Başal, 2001: Ş. Başal, " 1998 Yılı Tümülüs Kazıları» 10. Müze Çalışmaları ve Kurtarma Kazıları Sempozyumu, 179-188, Ankara. | |
| 31 | L, Alfonso, H. Egürer, GÜNEY KAPADOKYA’DA DEMİR ÇAĞI’NA IŞIK TUTACAKBİR ARKEOLOJİK YERLEŞİMİN KEŞFİ: KINIK HÖYÜK, ANADOLU’NUN ZİRVESİNDE TÜRK ARKEOLOJİSİNİN 40 YILI, 325-3337, 2014, Erzurum. | |
| Required Course instruments and materials | ||
| Supplementary books and articles and projection | ||
| Assessment Methods | |||
| Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
| mid-term exam | 8 | 3 | 35 |
| Other assessment methods | |||
| 1.Oral Examination | |||
| 2.Quiz | |||
| 3.Laboratory exam | |||
| 4.Presentation | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| 5.Report | |||
| 6.Workshop | 3,4,5,6,7 | 2 | 20 |
| 7.Performance Project | |||
| 8.Term Paper | 9 | 3 | 35 |
| 9.Project | |||
| final exam | 16 | 3 | 60 |
| Student Work Load | |||
| Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
| Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 3 | 16 | 48 |
| Outside Class | |||
| a) Reading | 2 | 14 | 28 |
| b) Search in internet/Library | 1 | 14 | 14 |
| c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
| d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 3 | 5 | 15 |
| e) Term paper/Project | 0 | ||
| Oral Examination | 0 | ||
| Quiz | 0 | ||
| Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
| Own study for mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| mid-term exam | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Own study for final exam | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| final exam | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| Attending Lectures | 3 | 14 | 42 |
| Citicising Paper | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Total work load; | 180 | ||