|
|||||
Year/Semester of Study | 4 / Fall Semester | ||||
Level of Course | 1st Cycle Degree Programme | ||||
Type of Course | Optional | ||||
Department | PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | ||||
Pre-requisities and Co-requisites | COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, | ||||
Mode of Delivery | Face to Face | ||||
Teaching Period | 14 Weeks | ||||
Name of Lecturer | MEHMET ÖZEL (mehmetozel@nevsehir.edu.tr) | ||||
Name of Lecturer(s) | |||||
Language of Instruction | Turkish | ||||
Work Placement(s) | None | ||||
Objectives of the Course | |||||
The aim of this course is to study the local government systems of the country examples which are tought in Comparative Public Administration course. |
Learning Outcomes | PO | MME | |
The students who succeeded in this course: | |||
LO-1 | The students can explain the comparative local government models based on samples. |
PO-1 Upon successful completion of the program students:
Learn essential theoretical and empirical concepts of the discipline’s main branches, Political Science, Administration Science, Urbanization and Environmental Problems and Legal Sciences and gain a perspective which is appropriate for creating solutions in this scope;
PO-2 Identify and compare concrete models of international and national public administration, determine problems and develop solution-oriented models; PO-3 Analyze compenents of political, administrative and institutional systems, design institutional systems, and make operational the process of decision-making and coordination mechanisms which are effective for institutionalization; PO-5 Have ability to collect data, analyze and interpret the results via utilizing accumulation of information and interdisciplinary point of view while identifying and solving existing public administration problems; |
Examination |
LO-2 | The students can give samples about local government systems' theory and implementations in the other countries. |
PO-1 Upon successful completion of the program students:
Learn essential theoretical and empirical concepts of the discipline’s main branches, Political Science, Administration Science, Urbanization and Environmental Problems and Legal Sciences and gain a perspective which is appropriate for creating solutions in this scope;
PO-2 Identify and compare concrete models of international and national public administration, determine problems and develop solution-oriented models; |
Examination |
LO-3 | The students can analyse the Turkish local governments features comparatively. |
PO-1 Upon successful completion of the program students:
Learn essential theoretical and empirical concepts of the discipline’s main branches, Political Science, Administration Science, Urbanization and Environmental Problems and Legal Sciences and gain a perspective which is appropriate for creating solutions in this scope;
PO-2 Identify and compare concrete models of international and national public administration, determine problems and develop solution-oriented models; PO-5 Have ability to collect data, analyze and interpret the results via utilizing accumulation of information and interdisciplinary point of view while identifying and solving existing public administration problems; |
Examination |
LO-4 | The students can develop solutions for local governments' problems. |
PO-1 Upon successful completion of the program students:
Learn essential theoretical and empirical concepts of the discipline’s main branches, Political Science, Administration Science, Urbanization and Environmental Problems and Legal Sciences and gain a perspective which is appropriate for creating solutions in this scope;
PO-2 Identify and compare concrete models of international and national public administration, determine problems and develop solution-oriented models; PO-3 Analyze compenents of political, administrative and institutional systems, design institutional systems, and make operational the process of decision-making and coordination mechanisms which are effective for institutionalization; PO-4 Gain ability to adaptate oneself to technologic innovations and use the maximum level of information technologies in order to make managerial decision-making and implementation process more efficient in terms of time and resources; PO-5 Have ability to collect data, analyze and interpret the results via utilizing accumulation of information and interdisciplinary point of view while identifying and solving existing public administration problems; PO-6 Gain ability to apply research methods and techniques in the social disciplines; |
Examination |
PO: Programme Outcomes MME:Method of measurement & Evaluation |
Course Contents | ||
Local government systems; local government models; comparison topics; country examples; EU and the local governments; comparison of Turkish local government system; reforming the local governments. | ||
Weekly Course Content | ||
Week | Subject | Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
1 | Local government systems and development of local governments | Lecture |
2 | Local government models | Lecture |
3 | Comparison topics | Lecture |
4 | Country examples-1 France | Lecture |
5 | Country examples-2 United States of America | Lecture |
6 | Country examples-3 England | Lecture |
7 | Country examples-4 Japan | Lecture |
8 | mid-term exam | |
9 | Country examples-5 Russia | Lecture |
10 | Country examples-6 Germany | Lecture |
11 | Country examples-7 Switzerland | Lecture |
12 | Country examples-8 Spain | Lecture |
13 | Comparison of Turkish Local government system | Lecture |
14 | EU and the local governments | Lecture |
15 | Globalization and refoming the local governments | Lecture |
16 | final exam | |
Recommend Course Book / Supplementary Book/Reading | ||
1 | Kutlu, Önder, Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Yönetimi : Teorik Çerçeve ve Ülke Uygulamaları, Çizgi Kitabevi, 2006. | |
2 | Emre, Cahit, Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Yönetimi: Birleşik Krallık, ABD, Fransa, Almanya ve Japonya’da Kamu Yönetiminin Yapısı ve İşleyişi, | |
3 | Parlak Bekir, Caner Cantürk, Karşılaştırmalı Siyasal Yönetimler ve Yönetsel Yapılar | |
4 | Güler, Birgül Ayman, Karasu, Koray, Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri (2. Basım, 2009). | |
5 | Rathod, P.B., Comparative Public Administration, Global Media, 2007. | |
6 | Chandler, J.A., Comparative Public Administration, Routledge, 2000. | |
7 | Dünyada Yerel Yönetimler-Hüseyin Özgür-Murat Okçu | |
Required Course instruments and materials | ||
Projection, Maps. |
Assessment Methods | |||
Type of Assessment | Week | Hours | Weight(%) |
mid-term exam | 8 | 1 | 40 |
Other assessment methods | |||
1.Oral Examination | |||
2.Quiz | |||
3.Laboratory exam | |||
4.Presentation | |||
5.Report | |||
6.Workshop | |||
7.Performance Project | |||
8.Term Paper | |||
9.Project | |||
final exam | 16 | 1 | 60 |
Student Work Load | |||
Type of Work | Weekly Hours | Number of Weeks | Work Load |
Weekly Course Hours (Theoretical+Practice) | 3 | 14 | 42 |
Outside Class | |||
a) Reading | 2 | 14 | 28 |
b) Search in internet/Library | 2 | 14 | 28 |
c) Performance Project | 0 | ||
d) Prepare a workshop/Presentation/Report | 0 | ||
e) Term paper/Project | 0 | ||
Oral Examination | 0 | ||
Quiz | 0 | ||
Laboratory exam | 0 | ||
Own study for mid-term exam | 9 | 1 | 9 |
mid-term exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Own study for final exam | 9 | 1 | 9 |
final exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
0 | |||
0 | |||
Total work load; | 118 |